<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GetBrowser &#187; Google Chrome Frame</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.getbrowser.net/tag/google-chrome-frame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.getbrowser.net</link>
	<description>A Guide to Browsers, Personal Finance, Insurance and Web Hosting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:11:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Mozilla Firefox Abandons Internet Explorer plug-in</title>
		<link>http://www.getbrowser.net/mozilla-firefox-abandons-internet-explorer-plug-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.getbrowser.net/mozilla-firefox-abandons-internet-explorer-plug-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Calking Chi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome Frame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plug-in]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getbrowser.net/?p=365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have just learned that Mozilla were thinking of developing a plug-in that would allow Internet Explorer to run on Firefox. Mozilla had hope that this could turn IE into a decent browser, but decided not to go ahead with the idea. This is something that Google should have done as well.
According to The Register, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have just learned that Mozilla were thinking of developing a plug-in that would allow Internet Explorer to run on Firefox. Mozilla had hope that this could turn IE into a decent browser, but decided not to go ahead with the idea. This is something that Google should have done as well.</p>
<p><span id="more-365"></span>According to The Register, Asa Dotzle from Mozilla Corp. said that this idea of a plug-in much like the one that Google Chrome uses was discussed two years ago. The idea was to try to make Microsoft’s Internet Explorer browser much faster, this would have been achieved by using the Firefox JavaScript engine.</p>
<p>Google thought that there was something good to offer an IE plug-in, which they released last September. Google have also been working hard on Google Wave and have made certain that Internet Explorer is able to run the new software.</p>
<p>Microsoft and Mozilla were not happy about this as they feel that the Chrome Frame would undermine not only the security but privacy as well. The move would also throw a huge amount of confusion if implanted.</p>
<p>In short, Chrome Frame is a plug-in. It&#8217;s like Flash. It doesn&#8217;t talk to things around it in the ways that it should.<br />
<h3>Related Posts</h3>
<ul class="related_post">
<li><a href="http://www.getbrowser.net/chrome-frame-result-in-browser-soup/" title="Mozilla’s Reply: Chrome Frame Will Result in “Browser Soup”">Mozilla’s Reply: Chrome Frame Will Result in “Browser Soup” (1)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.getbrowser.net/google-chrome-add-on-web-of-trust/" title="Web of Trust Add-on Comes to Google Chrome">Web of Trust Add-on Comes to Google Chrome (4)</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.getbrowser.net/mozilla-firefox-abandons-internet-explorer-plug-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

